Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41185629›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular bioengineering2025

Quantitative Analysis of Monocyte-Derived Macrophage NFκB Signaling in Cancer Co-culture Models Using Luciferase-Based Biosensing.

Colette Li, Megha Anand, Garrett McPheron, Maeve Stiles, Elizabeth Wayne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular bioengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Colette LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, 1107 Doherty Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15123 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7865-195X
Megha AnandDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, 1107 Doherty Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15123 USA.
Garrett McPheronInstitute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Foege Hall Room N215A, UW Box # 355061, 3720 15TH Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195-5061 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4956-5486
Maeve StilesInstitute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Foege Hall Room N215A, UW Box # 355061, 3720 15TH Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195-5061 USA.ORCID 0009-0009-4698-3886
Elizabeth WayneDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, 1107 Doherty Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15123 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8526-9732

Funding

Elucidating spatial and temporal dynamics of macrophage polarization using bioluminescence microscopyR35GM142957 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WAYNE, ELIZABETH C · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: In this study, we investigate the plasticity of tumor-associated macrophages, which originate from circulating monocytes and are associated with poor cancer prognosis. The differentiation of monocytes into macrophages is a dynamic and spatiotemporal process, as is the resulting macrophages' polarization. However, traditional methods for measuring polarization, such as qPCR and flow cytometry, provide only static information about polarization. To supplement these methods, we present a novel bioluminescent method that allows for time-resolved measurement of NFκB activation in macrophages while in co-culture with cancer cells. By using a monocyte cell line whose NFκB responsive element is labeled with firefly luciferase, we obtain a quantitative and temporal characterization of macrophage polarization in response to tumor-derived signals. Materials and Methods: To quantify the effect of tumor cell signaling THP-1 monocytes encoded with a firefly luciferase NFκB response element were co-cultured with cancer cells. We investigated the impact of the following factors on NFκB signaling cancer cell type (HCT116 or MDA-MB-231), ratio of the number of cancer cells to macrophages in co-culture, and the THP-1 cell differentiation state (monocyte or monocyte-derived macrophage). Bioluminescence was measured over three days. Descriptive features of the bioluminescence response curves were then extracted to compare effects between cancer types. Results: We observed that the MDA-MB-231 cancer cells induced lower but more persistent NFκB activation in THP-1 monocyte-derived macrophages than was observed in HCT116 co-culture. Higher number of cancer cells (lower macrophage ratio) elicited higher AUC values in HCT116 co-culture compared to low cancer cell conditions. There was no difference between high and low macrophage ratios within the MDA-MB-231 co-culture condition. Moreover, the addition of macrophage differentiation stimuli modulated the NFκB profile in the co-culture. PMA-differentiated macrophages expressed higher and faster peaks of NFκB activation. Conclusion: Cancer cells can modulate monocyte/macrophage NFκB transcriptional activity, impacting the overall tumor microenvironment. Using NFκB reporter cells, we found that HCT116 colorectal cancer cells induced fast and strong NFκB activation profiles. In contrast, MDA-MB-231 cancer cells elicited lower but more persistent NFκB activation profiles. This study highlights how bioluminescence reporter assays can be used to extract meaningful metrics about monocyte/macrophage behavior during tumor progression. This approach could also be used to understand the crosstalk between cancer cells and monocytes/macrophages that could be useful in a therapeutic of diagnostic context. Graphical Abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12195-025-00870-1.

Indexed as

BioluminescenceCanonical NFkB activationDifferentiationHCT116MacrophagesMDA-MB-231MonocytesNFkBNon-canonical NFkB activationTumor associated macrophages

Identifiers

PMID41185629
PMCPMC12579604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.