ReviewExperimental neurobiology2025
Glioblastoma Immunotherapy Adjuvants for Glial Cell Polarization Regulation.
Review in Experimental neurobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peripheral nerve injury induces an immunometabolic signature involving reduced free fatty-acid pools.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Article
- Reconstructing the glioblastoma microenvironment in heterotypic 3D spheroids: a multicellular model to study tumor-stromal crosstalk.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Integrating biocomputational techniques for vaccine development for glioblastoma multiforme: a possible way of enhancing precision.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) remains fatal despite maximal surgical resection, temozolomide chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Within the GBM microenvironment, tumor-educated microglia and astrocytes adopt immunoregulatory-like STAT3-high and ARG1/TGF-β-high phenotypes, respectively, which shield GBM cells from adaptive immune attack. In this review, we examine emerging adjuvant strategies designed to molecularly reprogram glial cells toward pro-inflammatory C3-high and IFN/NF-κB-high states, amplifying antitumor immunity. First, we summarize key aspects of GBM pathobiology and identify why conventional treatments fail to achieve durable control. Next, we dissect the signaling networks that govern glial phase states, including NF-κB, STAT3, IRF3, NLRP3, and cGAS-STING axes. We then provide a mechanism-centric analysis of pattern-recognition receptor (PRR) agonists, inflammasome modulators, and cyclic-dinucleotide STING agonists, integrating quantitative preclinical data with early clinical trial results. For each adjuvant, we distinguish between direct astrocytic engagement and indirect cytokine-mediated reprogramming. Modulation of glial phase states holds considerable promise for enhancing personalized vaccine efficacy and for converting immunologically "cold" GBM into a T cell-inflamed tumor. Consequently, targeting glial cell phase modulation is a highly attractive strategy for GBM immunotherapy, with the potential to maximize therapeutic benefit. Despite advances in chemo-, radio-, and checkpoint-blockade therapies, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) of GBM and its failure to establish memory immunity limit their impact. Tumor-polarized astrocytes and microglia form a barrier to effective T cell-mediated attack. Emerging evidence shows that redirecting glia toward pro-inflammatory phenotypes can recondition the TME, creating a more permissive landscape for immunotherapy. This review highlights glial phase reprogramming as a promising immunoadjuvant approach, emphasizing molecular circuits, synthetic modulators, and translational prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.