ArticleJournal of anatomy2026
Medullary radius as a major contributor to variance in the proximal femur: Insights from statistical shape modeling.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proximal femoral medullary canal morphology is a key determinant of cementless stem fit, primary stability, and load transfer in total hip arthroplasty (THA), yet population-level three-dimensional characterization remains limited. This study was designed to quantify variability in canal geometry and to capture dominant anatomical modes of variation with statistical shape modeling (SSM). Computed tomography data from 763 candidates for primary THA (389 female, 374 male; 20-92 years) were analyzed. Endosteal contours of the proximal canal were processed to build a point-correspondent SSM by principal component analysis (PCA). Five geometric features were evaluated per specimen: equivalent radius (normalized), roundness, major-axis angle (torsion), flare index, and curvature. Substantial inter-individual variability was observed across all features, with differences by sex and age. The first three principal components accounted for 68.4% of total variance, and each showed interpretable associations with at least one geometric feature. Model behavior was examined by synthetic sampling within ±2 SD (specificity) and by 10-fold cross-validation (generalization), indicating faithful reconstruction of real shapes and stable performance on held-out data. These findings provide a compact description of proximal canal shape variation and its key geometric drivers. The resulting population map is expected to support implant selection and sizing in preoperative planning, inform shape-based classification, and guide design envelopes for standard and personalized stems, with potential efficiencies in manufacturing and material use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.