ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2025
Single port access laparoscopic fundusectomy, more efficient uterus-sparing surgical method for multiple fibroids in patient with no pregnancy plan.
Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to introduce the clinical experience with a new surgical technique, single-port access laparoscopic fundusectomy, and a more efficient uterus-sparing surgical method for treating multiple fibroids in patients without a pregnancy plan.
methodsWe performed single-port access laparoscopic myomectomy in 228 patients and single-port access laparoscopic fundusectomy in 35 patients and compared the surgical outcomes.
resultsSignificant differences in the surgical outcomes were observed between the two operating.
methods. Operating time was 150.71±24.5 minutes in the fundusectomy group than 172.13±61.30 minutes in the multiple myomectomy group (P-value 0.042). Estimated blood loss was lesser (198.29±90.53 mL) in the fundusectomy group than (314.04±344.56 mL) in the multiple myomectomy group (P-value 0.049).
conclusionThis experience suggests that single-port access laparoscopic fundusectomy is more effective than single-port access laparoscopic myomectomy in terms of operating time and estimated blood loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.