Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41185076›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty (London, England)2025

VELYS robotic-assisted total knee replacement leads to improved mobility, reduction in hospitalisation, surgical duration, and better psychological outcomes: a propensity score matched analysis.

Jiawei Chen, Hong Yu Jared Chua, Jeremy Tze En Lim, Darren Keng-Jin Tay, Mann Hong Tan, Ming Han Lincoln Liow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiawei ChenYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Hong Yu Jared ChuaYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jeremy Tze En LimDepartment of Orthopaedics, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.
Darren Keng-Jin TayDepartment of Orthopaedics, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.
Mann Hong TanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.
Ming Han Lincoln LiowDepartment of Orthopaedics, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore. lincoln.liow.m.h@singhealth.com.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobotic TKA (rTKA) was developed to improve implant positioning and accuracy of bone cuts, potentially resulting in improved functional outcomes for the patient. The Depuy Synthes VELYS™ Robotic-Assisted Solution (VRAS) is one of the latest, imageless systems available and utilizes the ATTUNE™ primary knee system. Due to its recency, there is limited literature on the outcomes of VRAS compared to its conventional total knee arthroplasty (cTKA) counterpart. This paper aims to look at the differences between VRAS and cTKA regarding early postoperative and 6-month functional outcomes.

methodsRegistry data of all primary TKAs performed by 3 surgeons from January 2021 to December 2024 from a high-volume arthroplasty center were analysed. Patients who underwent VRAS or cTKA using ATTUNE™ implants were included. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression, followed by optimal matching in a 1:1 ratio to establish the VRAS and cTKA groups. Early postoperative outcomes (static/dynamic pain score, ambulation distance, length of stay), 6-month functional outcomes (Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, SF-36, patient expectation/satisfaction scores), and proportion attaining a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) were analysed.

resultsSixty-five VRAS patients were matched with 65 in the cTKA group. The VRAS showed significantly shorter surgical duration (78.2 vs. 85.5 min, P = 0.04), improved ambulation distance (22.2 vs. 11.3 m, P < 0.001), and shorter length of stay (2.48 vs. 3.66 days, P = 0.01). Both groups showed significant improvements in the majority of the functional outcome scores at 6 months. The VRAS displayed a trend towards higher SF-36 outcome measures, with significant differences in SF-36 vitality (P = 0.001), SF-36 mental component summary (P = 0.015), and a larger proportion of patients achieving SF-36 bodily pain MCID (76.9 vs 60.0%, P = 0.038). More patients reported satisfaction and expectation fulfillment (95.2% vs 92.3% and 92.1% vs 87.7%, respectively), albeit non-significantly (P = 0.718 and P = 0.413).

conclusionThe VRAS TKA demonstrated superior immediate postoperative advantages and patient-reported functional outcomes at 6 months. Further studies are needed to determine long-term outcomes.

trial registrationCentralized Institutional Review Board (CIRB: 2024-4046).

Indexed as

ATTUNEEarly outcomesFunctional outcomesRobotic-assistedTKAVELYS

Identifiers

PMID41185076
PMCPMC12581327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.