ArticleGenome biology2025
Comprehensive evaluation of diverse massively parallel reporter assays to functionally characterize human enhancers genome-wide.
Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust regulatory interplay of enhancers, facilitators, and promoters in a native chromatin context.Cell · 2026Article
- Directionality of transcriptional regulatory elements.Nature communications · 2026Article
- High-resolution reconstruction of cell-type-specific transcriptional regulatory processes from bulk sequencing samples.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- The Encyclopedia of DNA Elements.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Intrinsic promoter responsiveness dictates sensitivity to transcriptional activation by enhancers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The nascent transcriptome delineates the regulatory landscape in human health and disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Dual promoter-enhancer activities reflect a unified regulatory logic.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Decoding thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- HDI-STARR-seq Identifies Functional GH-regulated Sex-Biased Hepatocyte Enhancers Linked to Liver Metabolism and Disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive evaluation of diverse massively parallel reporter assays to functionally characterize human enhancers genome-wide.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMassively parallel reporter assays (MPRAs) and self-transcribing active regulatory region sequencing (STARR-seq) have revolutionized enhancer characterization by enabling high-throughput functional assessment of regulatory sequences.
resultsHere, we systematically evaluate six MPRA and STARR-seq datasets generated in the human K562 cell line and find substantial inconsistencies in enhancer calls from different labs that are primarily due to technical variations in data processing and experimental workflows. To address these variations, we implement a uniform enhancer call pipeline, which significantly improve cross-assay agreement. While increasing sequence overlap thresholds enhanced concordance in STARR-seq assays, cross-assay consistency in LentiMPRA is strongly influenced by assay-specific factors. Functional validation using candidate cis-regulatory elements (cCREs) confirms that epigenomic features such as chromatin accessibility and histone modifications are strong predictors of enhancer activity. Importantly, our study validates transcription as a critical hallmark of active enhancers, demonstrating that highly transcribed regions exhibit significantly higher active rates across assays. Furthermore, we show that transcription enhances the predictive power of epigenomic features, enabling more accurate and refined enhancer annotation.
conclusionsOur study provides a comprehensive framework for integrating different enhancer datasets and underscores the importance of accounting for assay-specific biases when interpreting enhancer activity. These findings refine enhancer identification using massively parallel reporter assays and improve the functional annotation of the human genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.