Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41185015›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2025

Military checkpoint exposure and predictive factors of quality of life among nurses during the 7th of October war in Palestine: a cross-sectional observational study.

Fuad Farajalla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fuad FarajallaNursing College, Palestinian Polytechnic University, Hebron, Palestine. Fuad.farajalla@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2881-1533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the 7th of October war in Palestine, nurses faced extreme stress from checkpoint delays, violence, and limited access to supportive healthcare systems.

objectiveTo assess military checkpoint exposure and predictive factors of QoL among nurses during the 7th of October war in Palestine.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in May 2025 among 350 nurses in Palestinian hospitals. A self-administered questionnaire collected sociodemographic data, war-related exposures, and WHOQOL-BREF scores. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 29, with multiple linear regression identifying predictors of QoL.

resultsMore than half of the nurses (52%) reported passing through military checkpoints to reach work, and 70.6% experienced violence, predominantly psychological. Poor QoL was most prevalent in the environmental (75.4%), psychological (60.3%), and physical (60%) domains. Passing through checkpoints (β = -0.261, p < .001), experiencing violence (β = -0.224, p < .001), and having a close relative injured or killed (β = -0.246, p < .001) were significant negative predictors, whereas higher education level was a positive predictor (β = 0.227, p < .001).

conclusionNurses' QoL was severely compromised during the conflict, particularly in environmental and psychological domains. Checkpoint exposure, violence, and personal loss emerged as the strongest negative predictors, while higher education was associated with better QoL. Addressing these factors through institutional safety measures, targeted psychosocial support, and workforce protection policies is critical to sustaining nursing capacity in politically unstable and high-risk environments.

Indexed as

CheckpointsConflictNursingPalestineQuality of lifeViolenceWHOQOL BREF

Identifiers

PMID41185015
PMCPMC12581498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.