Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41185005›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2025

Long-term waist circumference and diabetes risk in premenopausal women: role of shared risk factors.

Hye Ah Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hye Ah LeeClinical Trial Center, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, 1071, Anyangcheon-ro, Yangcheon-ku, Seoul, 07985, Republic of Korea. khyeah@naver.com.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2021R1A2C1003176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe menopausal transition, a critical period for midlife women's health, is marked by visceral fat redistribution. Although obesity and diabetes share common risk factors, their independent contributions to health risk remain unclear. This study investigated the association between 10-year mean waist circumference (WC) and incident type 2 diabetes in premenopausal women, and evaluated the impact of shared risk factors on both measures.

methodsUsing data from a community-based cohort with 16 years of follow-up, 1,482 premenopausal women at baseline were analyzed. The mean WC over 10 years was assessed, and its impact on incident type 2 diabetes over the subsequent six years was evaluated using Cox proportional models and visualized via mixed graphical model. Numerous demographics, lifestyle, genetic, and metabolic factors were considered shared risk factors.

resultsOver 10 years, WC increased by 0.22 cm annually (mean WC 78.3 cm). In the subsequent six years, 88 new cases of type 2 diabetes were identified. The mean WC varied with age, study area, education level, parental diabetes, alcohol consumption, and metabolic factors. Additionally, each 1 cm increase in the mean WC raised type 2 diabetes risk by 8% (95% CI: 1.05-1.11). Genetic factors; current smoking; and baseline metabolic factors were also independently associated with type 2 diabetes risk. This association persisted in women who transitioned to menopause during follow-up.

conclusionsThe association between higher WC during the menopausal transition and type 2 diabetes risk was observed. Comprehensive interventions aimed at lowering abdominal obesity could help reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2PremenopauseWaist CircumferenceAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedObesityRisk FactorsAbdominal obesityDiabetesMenopausal transitionRisk factorWaist circumference

Identifiers

PMID41185005
PMCPMC12581417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.