Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41184963›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Disabled people faced greater challenges accessing sexual and reproductive health services in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Britain: evidence from the Natsal-COVID survey.

Beattie R H Sturrock, Emily Dema, Raquel Bosó Pérez, Lorraine Stanley, Jo Gibbs, Pam Sonnenberg, Kirstin R Mitchell, Catherine H Mercer, Nigel Field

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Beattie R H SturrockInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK. b.sturrock@ucl.ac.uk.
Emily DemaInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Raquel Bosó PérezMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Lorraine StanleySex With A Difference (SWAD), Dorset, UK.
Jo GibbsInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Pam SonnenbergInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Kirstin R MitchellMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Catherine H MercerInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Nigel FieldInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK. nigel.field@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_ST_00022Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit MC_UU_00022/3; SPHSU18UCL-Birkbeck MRC Doctoral Training Programme MR/ N013867/1Wellcome Trust 212931/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisabled people face barriers to accessing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. There is evidence that the general population had difficulty accessing SRH services during COVID-19 but it remains unclear whether disabled people were differentially affected. This study sought to investigate whether people in Britain who reported a disability were more likely to report inability to access SRH services and whether this was associated with functional limitation.

methodsWe analysed data from the National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal)-COVID 2 study. This was a cross-sectional, web panel survey of 6,658 18-59-year-old British residents in March-April 2021. Quota-based sampling and weighting were used to achieve quasi-representative population estimates. We defined disability as a long-term physical or mental health condition which affected ones' ability to carry out day-to-day activities. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (AOR) by reported disability status for wanting but being unable to access ≥ 1 SRH service, wanting but not trying to access SRH services, inability to access different SRH services, and unmet need for condoms. Reasons for, and outcomes after, inability to access services were also investigated.

resultsParticipants reporting a disability (unweighted n = 1,676), compared to not, were more likely to report wanting but being unable to access ≥ 1 SRH service (AOR 2.23 [1.77-2.82]), inability to access each SRH service type, and an unmet need for condoms. Increasing functional limitation levels were more strongly associated with reporting inability to access ≥ 1 SRH service. Reported disability was associated with higher odds of wanting but not trying to access SRH services (AOR 2.60 [1.50-4.52]) among men but not among women. Participants reporting a disability were more likely to report transport issues and accessing their desired service eventually but not in the way they wanted.

conclusionsOur study provides evidence that disabled people in Britain were more likely to have difficulty accessing SRH services during COVID-19. However, the extent to which these disparities were created or exacerbated by the pandemic, and whether inequalities persist, is not clear. Our results are relevant for contemporary service design, given that many changes introduced during the pandemic have endured.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health Services AccessibilityPersons with DisabilitiesReproductive Health ServicesAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomYoung AdultBritainCOVID-19DisabilityReproductive healthService accessSexual health

Identifiers

PMID41184963
PMCPMC12581559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.