Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41184946›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2025

Patterns and perceived risks of personal auditory device use among medical students: a cross-sectional study.

Pranil Shah, Prashant Dave, Labhita Das, Utkarsh Shah, Niraj Bharadva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pranil ShahDepartment of Community Medicine, GMERS Medical College, Navsari, Gujarat, India.
Prashant DaveDepartment of Community Medicine, Parul Institute Medical Sciences & Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Labhita DasDepartment of Community Medicine, Parul Institute Medical Sciences & Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. Labhita.das40163@paruluniversity.ac.in.
Utkarsh ShahDepartment of Community Medicine, Parul Institute Medical Sciences & Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. utkarsh.shah29779@paruluniversity.ac.in.
Niraj BharadvaDepartment of Community Medicine, Parul Institute Medical Sciences & Research, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe World Health Organization estimates that 1.1 billion people are at risk of developing noise-induced hearing loss from the unsafe use of Personal Auditory Devices (PADs). The use of these devices has grown exponentially, placing young adults at high risk of recreational NIHL and other ear-related health problems. This study aimed to explore PAD usage patterns among medical students, identify perceived ear and hearing health problems, and analyse the association between usage patterns and these issues.

results92% of students reported using PADs. A majority used them daily, with an average duration of nearly five hours. Many participants reported listening at high volumes and perceived ear and hearing health problems as a result. Notably, almost half of the users felt unable to discontinue their PAD use despite acknowledging potential adverse effects. There was a significant association between the daily duration of PAD use and the perception of adverse ear and hearing health effects. The continuous, prolonged, and high-intensity use of PADs among medical students is a significant issue that could escalate into a public health concern regarding ear and hearing health.

Indexed as

Hearing Loss, Noise-InducedMP3-PlayerStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultEar healthHearing lossMedical studentsNIHLPersonal auditory devicesPublic health

Identifiers

PMID41184946
PMCPMC12581484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.