ArticleBMC public health2025
A multi-national cross-sectional exploration of rehabilitation services for children and young people following brain injury in low and middle income countries.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrain injury (BI) is the largest cause of mortality and morbidity among children and can lead to significant cognitive, social, emotional and behavioural deficits. There has been an absence of research examining the availability of rehabilitation services for affected children and young people in low and middle income countries (LMICs). This study therefore investigated current rehabilitation provision in LMICs for children and young people with BI.
methodsAn online survey was developed which collected data on funding support for rehabilitation, causes of BI and access to services. The survey was distributed to healthcare professionals known to members of the research team. Participants were asked to forward the survey to other professionals in their networks. Representation was sought from as many LMICs as possible. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics (e.g. percentages) and the Kruskal Wallis test to explore differences between Official Development Assistance (ODA) status (least developed, lower middle and upper middle) on access to services.
resultsA total of 179 participants from 32 LMICs responded to the survey. Healthcare professionals from the least developed countries reported charities as the main source of funding to support rehabilitation, while those from upper middle income regions were most often funded by governments. According to healthcare professionals, the greatest cause of BI in LMICs was hypoxia. The Kruskal Wallis test comparing ODA status showed statistically significant differences in access to services for occupational (P = .005), speech and language (P = .038) and aquatic therapies (P < .001), cognitive (p < .001) and vocational rehabilitation (P = .008), and community based inclusive development programmes (P = .009).
conclusionsThere is a lack of equity in accessibility of rehabilitation services for children and young people with BI in LMICs, with some services being non-existent in lower income countries. Improvements to obstetric services, screening and management of infectious diseases are needed to reduce rates of hypoxic injuries and injury prevention programmes are needed to reduce traumatic injury. Centralised, government funding is required to develop services to improve life chances for these children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.