ArticleBMC public health2025
Characterising disability in patients with long COVID-does gender matter? an analytic cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the implementation of a long COVID rehabilitation intervention: a mixed-methods process evaluation.BMC health services research · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong COVID affects patients' daily functioning and activity participation. However, gender-specific differences remain insufficiently explored despite well-documented effects of gender on health outcomes. This study examines gender differences in sociodemographic characteristics, employment status, sick leave, and mental fatigue among individuals with long COVID. Furthermore, this study explores self-reported and prioritised problems with activities of daily living (ADL) across genders and compares patterns between women and men. We hypothesised that traditional gender roles would manifest in distinct challenges for women and men.
methodsWe included 780 individuals (567 women and 213 men) diagnosed with long COVID who were referred to occupational therapy at a Danish outpatient clinic for long COVID. Sociodemographic characteristics, employment status, and sick leave were self-reported. Mental fatigue was assessed using the Mental Fatigue Scale, and ADL problems using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. A qualitative deductive content analysis was conducted to further categorise prioritised ADL problems.
resultsA higher proportion of women than men had higher education (55% vs. 37%). No statistically significant gender difference was seen in the prevalence of sick leave (57% vs. 50%). Moderate to severe mental fatigue was reported by 78% of women and 68% of men, with women reporting significantly higher fatigue (p < 0.001). Minor gender differences in ADL problems were observed, with more women reporting difficulties in household management, quiet recreation, and social interaction. Both women and men prioritised similar ADL problems, such as paid work, physical activity, social interaction, and fulfilling caregiving roles.
conclusionADL challenges reported by women and men were largely similar and had a significant impact on their daily lives. Identifying key activity limitations is essential to inform effective rehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.