ArticleBMC public health2025
A scoping review to identify opportunities and challenges for communities of South Asian origin in accessing mental health services and support in high-income countries.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of cross-lingual competence in Australian mental health professionals.Australian journal of psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCommunities of South Asian origin in high-income countries experience a significantly high prevalence of mental health disorders relative to other migrant populations. Emerging evidence highlights socio-cultural and systemic challenges to mental health care access for culturally diverse communities in high-income English speaking countries; however, there is no comprehensive qualitative evidence regarding the opportunities and challenges faced by these communities. To address this knowledge gap, this scoping review aimed to explore the lived experiences of South Asian communities in accessing mental health care across four selected high-income nations (the United Kingdom, Australia, the United States, and Canada).
methodsThis scoping review followed reporting guidelines for scoping reviews outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. A systematic search was conducted to identify qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies published in English between January 2000 - January 2023 in three electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The search strategy included keywords related to South Asian communities, mental health and access to health care in the chosen high-income countries. Extracted qualitative data was analysed using a thematic analysis.
resultsAnalysis of the 25 included studies identified interlinked opportunities and challenges informing the ability of South Asian communities to access mental health care. Findings have been structured according to dimensions of accessibility of services: (1) approachability, (2) acceptability, (3) availability and accommodation, (4) affordability, and (5) appropriateness. Our study identified myriad challenges faced by South Asian communities including inflexible accessibility to diverse mental health care, difficult family dynamics, stigma and acculturative issues hindering mental health care usage and poor mental health care experiences informing perceptions of mental health care and re-engagement.
conclusionThe research finds that access to mental health care for those from South Asian backgrounds requires a comprehensive and nuanced framework that addresses population-specific barriers, systemic inequalities and socio-cultural factors. Recommendations include increasing cultural safety, facilitating flexible models of care and service delivery in practice, alongside policy and funding reflective of systemic mental health care access issues, alongside implementation research to assess the effectiveness of such recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.