ArticleBMC public health2025
Spatial analysis of depression and anxiety among frontline health workers during Nigeria's COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic caused considerable panic and anxiety among health workers in all countries of the world, including Nigeria. This study aimed to identify the spatial clustering for prevalence and factors associated with anxiety and depression among frontline health workers (FHWs) during COVID-19 in the 36 states of Nigeria.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study conducted in COVID-19 hospital treatment centres (one in each state) across 36 Nigerian states and Federal Capital Territory. A total of 3,353 FHWs were recruited using convenient sampling technique. The main outcomes were depression and anxiety symptoms examined using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and categorised into binary. The sequential modelling approach in Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with anxiety and depression among FHWs. The spatial distribution of anxiety and depression across Nigerian states was examined, and prevalence and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for mental health outcomes were visualized using ArcGIS Desktop 10.86, with graduated color symbols representing aORs adjusted for confounders.
resultsFHWs in the Southeastern States of Anambra, Enugu, Abia, and Imo, experienced higher odds of depression and anxiety compared with other states. For anxiety alone, higher odds were observed among FHWs in Benue, Cross River, Ebonyi, and Edo states. Logistic regression analyses revealed higher odds for anxiety and depression among Nurses, while FHWs who have practiced for 1-6 years had significantly higher odds for depression (adjusted odds ratios (AOR) = 3.21, 95%CI: 1.90, 5.43 for 5-6 years; and AOR = 2.33, 95%CI: 1.27, 4.26 for 1-4 years). The odds for anxiety and depression were significantly lower among FHWs with a prior history of psychological distress compared to those without such a history.
conclusionsThis study highlights significant spatial clustering of anxiety and depression among FHWs in Nigeria, with the highest burden in Southeastern states. Nurses and FHWs with fewer years of practice were particularly vulnerable, indicating the need for targeted mental health interventions. Those with a prior history of psychological distress had lower odds of experiencing anxiety and depression, suggesting potential resilience or coping mechanisms. These findings underscore the urgency for tailored mental health support and policy interventions to mitigate the psychological impact of future public health crises on healthcare workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.