ArticleBMC public health2025
A mixed-method scoping review examining parental perspectives on heavy metal exposure in children.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeavy metal exposure is a public health problem, especially in vulnerable populations such as children. A growing body of scholarly research sheds light on the issue of heavy metal exposure among children. However, there are still some gaps in the understanding of the full spectrum of factors that influence awareness and knowledge about the effects of heavy metals on children, especially in African countries. Children exposed to heavy metals primarily receive care from their parents. This scoping study aims to methodically map and synthesise the current literature on parental perspectives on children's exposure to heavy metals.
methodsThe methodology employed in this scoping review was based on the techniques outlined by Arksey and O'Malley, as well as the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The review assessed and further processed articles published in English between 1970 and 2023. The reviews encompassed studies conducted globally with no significant geographical limitations or various methodologies. This review primarily focused on qualitative studies in the search strategy. It also included survey and questionnaire studies, in addition to other search terms. The authors synthesised the results via descriptive and narrative analysis.
resultsThe scoping review examined and included 30 publications out of the 424 records that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study identified four primary elements that contribute to parental experiences: knowledge regarding the health consequences of heavy metal exposure, factors that contribute to elevated levels of heavy metal exposure in children, approaches to reduce heavy metal exposure, and factors that hinder or support behavioural modifications in parents of children with heavy metal exposure.
conclusionParents' experiences with children exposed to lead vary by area and remain inadequately understood, particularly in low-income countries. There is an increased need for parental knowledge and active prevention measures regarding heavy metal exposure. The consequences of exposure can be dire, underscoring the urgency and seriousness of this public health issue. Therefore, further study is necessary to clarify the fundamental concepts that inform practice and policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.