Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41184784›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

Deep learning technique for plant disease classification and pest detection and model explainability elevating agricultural sustainability.

Wasswa Shafik, Ali Tufail, Liyanage Chandratilak De Silva, Rosyzie Anna Awg Haji Mohd Apong, Ki-Hyung Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wasswa ShafikDig Connectivity Research Laboratory, (DCRLab), , Kampala, 600040, Uganda. wasswashafik@ieee.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9320-3186
Ali TufailSchool of Digital Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, BE1410, Brunei Darussalam.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4871-4080
Liyanage Chandratilak De SilvaSchool of Digital Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, BE1410, Brunei Darussalam.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7128-5945
Rosyzie Anna Awg Haji Mohd ApongSchool of Digital Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, BE1410, Brunei Darussalam.
Ki-Hyung KimDepartment of Cyber Security,, Ajou University, Suwon , 16499, Republic of Korea.

Funding

MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) support program IITP2021-2021-0-01835the research grant (No. 2021-0-00590 Decentralized High-Performance: 2021-0-00590; IITP2021-2021-0-01835) 2021R1F1A1045861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid advancement of technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning, and precision agriculture tools is driving the development of efficient, data-driven crop management solutions. These innovations are increasingly critical in modern agriculture, where early and accurate detection of plant diseases plays a vital role in securing crop yields and sustainability. Agronomists, agriculturists, and local farmers continue to face significant economic losses due to delayed diagnosis or misclassification of diseases affecting high-value crops, key contributors to the global market. Failure to identify and manage such diseases in time can severely impact both agricultural productivity and global food supply chains. To achieve the United Nations’ sustainable development goals of zero hunger, climate change, good health, and well-being, early and timely disease detection is critical to ensure increased apple-related production, damage control, and reduced application of inappropriate herbicides that pollute the environment. Despite the availability of various methods for early disease detection and classification, how early signs of green attacks can be identified remains uncertain. Using the Turkey Plant Pests and Diseases (TPPD) dataset with 4,447 images categorized into 15 diverse classes, this research implements ResNet-9 to detect and classify the commonly known pests and diseases of six plants, including Malus pumila, Prunus armeniaca, Prunus padus, Prunus persica L. Batsch., Pyrus communis L., and Juglans regia. A laborious hyperparameter tuning, hyperparameter optimization, and augmentation procedure on the training set was done for some imbalanced dataset classes. Testing results of the proposed model demonstrated accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score values of 97.4%, 96.4%, 97.09%, And 95.7%, respectively, which is a significant leap in comparison to other existing research. This study further elucidates and enhances the interpretability of the proposed model by making saliency maps available using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) that efficiently illustrate the rationale behind the model’s prediction capabilities. The study further tested the statistical significance of the model, the Area Under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), and the confidence interval (CI). Critical observations revealed that the model uses several visual cues for disease detection and classification, including (i) edge contours and shape structures that help define lesion boundaries, (ii) texture and color variations that signal symptom type and severity, and (iii) high-activation regions that indicate areas of strong feature relevance. These cues collectively guide the model in distinguishing between visually similar disease patterns across different plant parts. The application of SHAP saliency maps further enabled interpretation by visually localizing and quantifying the influence of these features on the model’s predictions.

Indexed as

AgricultureCrops, AgriculturalDeep LearningPlant DiseasesClassification AlgorithmsAgricultural sustainabilityArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDisease detectionModel explainabilityPest classificationSHapley additive explanations (SHAP)Sustainable development goals

Identifiers

PMID41184784
PMCPMC12581344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.