SynthesisBMC medical imaging2025
Performance of artificial intelligence-assisted ultrasound elastography in classifying benign and malignant breast tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shear-wave dispersion imaging outperforms shear-wave elastography in small lesions and BI-RADS 4B classification.European radiology · 2026Article
- Multiparametric Abdominal Ultrasound as a Source of Imaging Biomarkers in Predictive and Personalized Medicine: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrecise benign and malignant breast tumors classification is essential for effective treatment planning and outcome prognostication. Medical imaging's capability to classify breast tumors has been greatly improved by the accelerated advancement of artificial intelligence (AI). This research presents a comprehensive evaluation of the efficiency of AI-assisted ultrasound elastography (UE) specifically applied to classify benign and malignant breast tumors for the first time.
methodsWe conducted extensive literature search in PubMed, Embase, IEEE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, and China Biology Medicine disc (CBM) to identify relevant studies that applied or developed AI algorithms for classifying benign and malignant breast masses employing UE. We used bivariate mixed-effects model for statistical analysis, obtaining binary diagnostic accuracy data to generate pooled estimates (e.g., sensitivity and specificity). The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-AI (QUADAS-AI) tool was applied to assess the methodological quality of the included research. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to verify the robustness of the findings, and Deeks' funnel plot was employed to examine potential publication bias. Meta-regression analysis was used to investigate the sources of heterogeneity. Clinical applicability was evaluated by Fagan nomogram.
resultsThe meta-analysis comprised sixteen relevant studies. Summary estimates indicated high diagnostic accuracy: the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.94), the pooled specificity was 0.88 (0.81-0.93), the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 7.5 (4.7-11.9), and the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.11 (0.07-0.18). The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 67 (33-137), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.95 (0.93-0.97).
conclusionAI-assisted UE demonstrates outstanding performance in benign and malignant breast tumors classification. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024590031).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.