ArticleBMC primary care2025
Evaluating quality and utilisation of primary care among older adults in Hong Kong: a mixed-methods study protocol.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHong Kong’s rapidly ageing population poses significant challenges to the sustainability of its healthcare system. With over 75% of adults aged 65 and above experiencing at least one chronic condition, enhancing the accessibility and quality of primary care is critical. Despite policy efforts such as the Primary Healthcare Blueprint and District Health Centres (DHCs), significant structural and operational challenges persist, including low service engagement, fragmented multidisciplinary care coordination, and socioeconomic inequities in access, perceived service quality, and satisfaction. Building on evidence that socioeconomic factors would influence care access, this study examines how these disparities shape older adults’ primary care experiences.
methodsThis mixed-methods study investigates the quality and utilisation of primary care among older adults in Hong Kong. Phase 1 involves a quantitative survey using the Chinese version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT-C), combined with validated measures of service quality, satisfaction, trust, and revisit intention. A geographically and socioeconomically stratified cluster sampling strategy will be used to collect 510 responses. Phase 2 consists of qualitative focus group discussions with at least 25 older adults and their caregivers to explore in-depth experiences and expectations regarding primary care. DISCUSSION: Findings will provide a multidimensional understanding of primary care delivery and its impact on older adults’ satisfaction and behavioural intentions. Early data suggest that while technical care remains difficult for patients to evaluate, non-clinical service quality, such as staff communication and system efficiency greatly influences perceived value. Socioeconomic disparities also affect care continuity and trust. This study will identify gaps in meeting the needs and expectations of older adults for primary care service and propose targeted interventions to enhance primary care accessibility and quality for older adults. Insights will inform policy adjustments to better support healthy ageing and reduce dependence on overstretched hospital services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.