ArticleThe Journal of eukaryotic microbiology
Long Term Copepod Culture Houses a Rich Microbial Eukaryotic Community Including New and Known Symbionts.
Article in The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long Term Copepod Culture Houses a Rich Microbial Eukaryotic Community Including New and Known Symbionts.The Journal of eukaryotic microbiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Copepods, dominant marine zooplankton, are hosts to microbial eukaryotic symbionts, but the copepod eukaryome remains largely unexplored. We used 18S rRNA gene primers with reduced metazoan amplification to identify microbial eukaryotes in a culture of Calanus finmarchicus (Copepoda). Samples were taken from the inlet water (99.5% of reads from non-copepod sources) and the contents of the culture, which included ambient water (99.7%), bulk (many crushed copepods, 60.2%), individual copepods (1%-41%, mean = 7.4), and bulk fecal pellets (74%). The microbial eukaryotic community in the culture differed from the inlet water. The culture contained saprotrophs and bacterivores typical of eutrophic aquacultures and known parasites of copepods. Individual copepod eukaryomes varied in richness (8-33 operational taxonomic units, mean = 16.1) and revealed variation in non-copepod read yields related to specific taxa. Perkinsea, not previously reported in copepods, as well as Ascomycota and Basidiomycota (Fungi), formed the core eukaryome (found in > 90% of individuals), indicating potentially important symbiosis. The small eukaryome, relative to reported microbiomes in C. finmarchicus, suggests that ecological inferences from microbiomes, which largely address bacteria, are not readily applicable to the eukaryotic microbes. The study underpins the need for investigations of eukaryomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.