ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Patch-Wise Approach with Vision Transformer for Detecting Implant Failure in Spinal Radiography.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal implant failures are becoming more common due to the increasing number of surgeries and an aging population. Early detection is crucial but often missed on radiographs due to subtle features and limited radiologist availability. This study aims to develop and validate a vision transformer-based deep learning model for detecting spinal implant fractures and to assess its impact on radiologist performance. The training and testing datasets included 9924 spinal radiographs (3492 studies) from 798 patients, between 2003 and 2023. A DINOv2-based model first detected spinal implants in radiographs, then analyzed 224 × 224-pixel patches within those regions to classify the presence or absence of implant fractures. Three radiologists (1 to 16 years of experience) independently reviewed the test set (1538 images) with and without AI assistance. Performance was measured using accuracy, F1 score, precision, recall, and generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis. The AI model achieved a recall of 0.94, precision of 0.37, F1 score of 0.54, and accuracy of 0.83. With AI assistance, radiologist recall improved from 0.70 to 0.95, with the greatest gain seen in the least experienced reader (0.49 to 0.92). GEE analysis confirmed significant diagnostic improvement (OR = 2.82, p < 0.001), particularly in rod fractures. This patch-wise transformer-based approach demonstrated high sensitivity and improved reader performance, supporting its use as a triage tool in spinal implant surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.