ReviewSurgical endoscopy2025
Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: progress, challenges, and emerging applications.
Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights into programmed cell death from multiple imaging modalities.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Image stitching for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy via a motion consistency constraint.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Advancements in interventional gastroenterology GI tract cancers: A narrative review.Medicine · 2026Review
- Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment With Cholangiopancreatoscopy.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
- Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy: Real-Time Histology at the Fingertips: A Comprehensive Review of Current Applications of Endomicroscopy in Barrett Esophagus, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and Colorectal Lesions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Multimodal endoscopic diagnosis in biliary oncology: integrating EUS-guided tissue acquisition and cholangioscopy for personalized cancer care.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Real-time microscopic visualisation: current applications and challenges of confocal laser endomicroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel disorders.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Confocal laser endomicroscopy for upper gastrointestinal neoplasia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsProbe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) provides real-time, cellular-level "optical biopsy" during endoscopy. This review synthesizes the technology, diagnostic performance, clinical use, safety, costs, and future directions of pCLE across gastrointestinal indications.
methodsTargeted narrative review of randomized trials, meta-analyses, and observational studies on pCLE in Barrett's esophagus, gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM), colorectal neoplasia, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and indeterminate biliary strictures. Outcomes included sensitivity/specificity, impact on biopsy yield and management, adverse events, and cost effectiveness.
resultspCLE combines a fiber-optic probe and IV fluorescein with 488-nm excitation to generate optical sections (~ 1 µm lateral resolution; depth ~ 55-70 µm). In Barrett's esophagus, adding pCLE to high-definition endoscopy nearly doubled neoplasia detection sensitivity versus standard protocols. For GIM, pooled sensitivity and specificity reached 97% and 94%. For colorectal lesions, sensitivity 81-91% and specificity 75-91% allowed in vivo characterization and fewer unnecessary resections. In IBD surveillance, pCLE identified more neoplasia with fewer biopsies (up to ~ 4.7-fold increase) and pooled sensitivity/specificity of 87-100%/90-94%. In indeterminate biliary strictures, pCLE integrated with ERCP/EUS improved accuracy and achieved negative predictive values up to 100%. Safety is favorable; risks relate mainly to fluorescein. Limitations include superficial penetration, narrow field of view, operator dependence, image-interpretation variability, procedure time, and high capital and per-case costs. Current guidelines view pCLE as an adjunct rather than routine standard. Emerging AI-assisted interpretation and molecular/ multispectral probes may standardize reads, expand indications, and improve yield.
conclusionspCLE strengthens endoscopic decision-making by enabling immediate, near-histologic assessment, targeted sampling, and earlier therapy. Broader adoption hinges on standardized training, validated image criteria, multicenter randomized trials with health-economic endpoints, and integration of AI and molecular imaging to reduce variability and cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.