Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41184675›Full record

ReviewSurgical endoscopy2025

Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: progress, challenges, and emerging applications.

Mohammed Ayyad, Dhir Gala, Maram Albandak, Ritik M Goyal, Yazan Abboud, Ahmed Al-Khazraji, Kaveh Hajifathalian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment With Cholangiopancreatoscopy.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammed AyyadDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 S Orange Ave, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA. dr.mohammad.ayyad@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9772-2365
Dhir GalaDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 S Orange Ave, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
Maram AlbandakDepartment of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Ritik M GoyalDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 S Orange Ave, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
Yazan AbboudUCLA Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ahmed Al-KhazrajiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Kaveh HajifathalianDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsProbe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) provides real-time, cellular-level "optical biopsy" during endoscopy. This review synthesizes the technology, diagnostic performance, clinical use, safety, costs, and future directions of pCLE across gastrointestinal indications.

methodsTargeted narrative review of randomized trials, meta-analyses, and observational studies on pCLE in Barrett's esophagus, gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM), colorectal neoplasia, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and indeterminate biliary strictures. Outcomes included sensitivity/specificity, impact on biopsy yield and management, adverse events, and cost effectiveness.

resultspCLE combines a fiber-optic probe and IV fluorescein with 488-nm excitation to generate optical sections (~ 1 µm lateral resolution; depth ~ 55-70 µm). In Barrett's esophagus, adding pCLE to high-definition endoscopy nearly doubled neoplasia detection sensitivity versus standard protocols. For GIM, pooled sensitivity and specificity reached 97% and 94%. For colorectal lesions, sensitivity 81-91% and specificity 75-91% allowed in vivo characterization and fewer unnecessary resections. In IBD surveillance, pCLE identified more neoplasia with fewer biopsies (up to ~ 4.7-fold increase) and pooled sensitivity/specificity of 87-100%/90-94%. In indeterminate biliary strictures, pCLE integrated with ERCP/EUS improved accuracy and achieved negative predictive values up to 100%. Safety is favorable; risks relate mainly to fluorescein. Limitations include superficial penetration, narrow field of view, operator dependence, image-interpretation variability, procedure time, and high capital and per-case costs. Current guidelines view pCLE as an adjunct rather than routine standard. Emerging AI-assisted interpretation and molecular/ multispectral probes may standardize reads, expand indications, and improve yield.

conclusionspCLE strengthens endoscopic decision-making by enabling immediate, near-histologic assessment, targeted sampling, and earlier therapy. Broader adoption hinges on standardized training, validated image criteria, multicenter randomized trials with health-economic endpoints, and integration of AI and molecular imaging to reduce variability and cost.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalGastrointestinal DiseasesBarrett EsophagusHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalSensitivity and SpecificityBarrett’s esophagusConfocal endomicroscopyGastrointestinal imagingInflammatory bowel diseasepCLEReal-time biopsy

Identifiers

PMID41184675
PMCPMC12708787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.