Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41184673›Full record

Observational studySurgical endoscopy2026

Analysis of gas embolism in pediatric laparoscopy: incidence, risk factors, and preventive strategies.

Sara Fuentes, Nerea Vicente-Sánchez, Nuria Margarit-Estragués, Sergio Flores-Villar, Mónica Pérez-Poquet, Sandra Gasca-Pera, Marina Alcoberro-González, Miriam de la Maza-Segovia, Rubén López-Canos, Marta Rodriguez-Cornet and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sara FuentesPediatric Surgery Department, Mutua de Terrassa University Hospital, Terrasa, Spain. sfuentes@mutuaterrassa.cat.ORCID 0000-0002-0285-681X
Nerea Vicente-SánchezPediatric Surgery Department, Mutua de Terrassa University Hospital, Terrasa, Spain.
Nuria Margarit-EstraguésDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mutua de Terrassa University Hospital, Terrasa, Spain.
Sergio Flores-VillarPediatrics Department, Mutua de Terrassa University Hospital, Terrasa, Spain.
Mónica Pérez-PoquetDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mutua de Terrassa University Hospital, Terrasa, Spain.
Sandra Gasca-PeraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mutua de Terrassa University Hospital, Terrasa, Spain.
Marina Alcoberro-GonzálezDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mutua de Terrassa University Hospital, Terrasa, Spain.
Miriam de la Maza-SegoviaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mutua de Terrassa University Hospital, Terrasa, Spain.
Rubén López-CanosDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mutua de Terrassa University Hospital, Terrasa, Spain.
Marta Rodriguez-CornetDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mutua de Terrassa University Hospital, Terrasa, Spain.
Carme Grande-MoreilloPediatric Surgery Department, Mutua de Terrassa University Hospital, Terrasa, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGas embolism during pediatric laparoscopic surgery is often subclinical but can have serious consequences. Identifying patient and procedure-related risk factors is essential to improve perioperative safety and outcomes. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine risk factors associated with gas embolism in pediatric laparoscopy and to propose preventive strategies. STUDY

designSingle-center, prospective observational study including 57 pediatric patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) from January 2021 to June 2025. Intraoperative gas embolism was monitored by transthoracic echocardiography. Patient demographics, laparoscopic preset, CO₂ volume used, and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) variations were analyzed as potential risk factors.

resultsGas embolism was detected in 25 patients (43.9%; 95% CI 31.0-56.7%). Patient characteristics and laparoscopic setting parameters were not associated with gas embolism. Repetitive intra-abdominal volume variations were strongly associated with the occurrence of gas embolism (OR 49.8, 95% CI 9.14-271.65; p < 0.0001). The median CO₂ volume was higher in the embolism group (28 vs. 20 L, p = 0.002).

conclusionsGas embolism is common in pediatric laparoscopy, although most episodes are subclinical. Repetitive intra-abdominal pressure variations, which lead to higher CO₂ consumption, significantly increase gas embolism risk. Awareness and careful intraoperative management are essential, particularly in high-risk procedures, to minimize potential complications. These findings support future multi-center studies to validate preventive strategies.

Indexed as

Embolism, AirIntraoperative ComplicationsLaparoscopyAdolescentCarbon DioxideChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantMalePneumoperitoneum, ArtificialProspective StudiesRisk FactorsCarbon DioxideAppendectomyCO₂ InsufflationGas embolismIntra-abdominal pressurePediatric laparoscopy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.