ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2026
Clostridioides difficile infection among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) poses a significant healthcare burden. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at increased risk of poor outcomes. This study aims to compare CDI outcomes, including mortality, in patients with and without DM. Retrospective data between (2014-2024) from Clalit Health Services (CHS) electronic database were analyzed. Among 2319 patients with confirmed CDI, 1005 had DM, and 1314 did not. DM patients were significantly older (74.5 ± 12.0 vs. 68.6 ± 20.4 years; p < 0.001), more likely to be male (p = 0.029), and disproportionately represented in lower socioeconomic status (SES) groups (30.1% vs. 22.4%; p < 0.001). Additionally, patients with DM had a significantly higher prevalence of comorbidities, with a median Charlson comorbidity Index (CCI) of 7.5 compared to 4.9 (p < 0.001), along with higher serum creatinine levels and lower albumin levels (p < 0.001). All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the DM group (p < 0.001). Deceased patients were notably older (p < 0.001), more likely male, and had lower SES (27% vs. 25.1%, p = 0.028). Patients with DM and CDI exhibited different comorbidities compared to those without diabetes. DM, advanced age, low SES, and male gender are linked to poorer outcomes, including mortality, among patients with CDI. These findings underscore the need for intensive management in patients with diabetes and CDI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.