Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41184647›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2025

The significant differences between types 1 and 2 basilar invagination - a case- control study based on the sphenoid bone.

Ítalo T Oliveira Filho, Ricardo V Botelho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ítalo T Oliveira FilhoHealth Sciences post-graduation program, Instituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Público Estadual - IAMSPE, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7701-0624
Ricardo V BotelhoHealth Sciences post-graduation program, Instituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Público Estadual - IAMSPE, São Paulo, Brazil. bitbot@uol.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9018-2746

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basilar invagination (BI) is a congenital malformation of the skull base, in which underdevelopment of the cranial base displaces the odontoid process cranially and posteriorly. Few studies have examined the role of sphenoid bone in BI, despite its central position occupying large portion of the skull base. The objective of this study is to compare the craniometric measurements centered on the sphenoid bone between the two types of BI, and normal controls. This is a cross-sectional study based on MRI and CT databases from authors practice, from 1985 to June 2024. The craniometrics of the sphenoid bone were measured in BI subtypes and controls. A total of 106 images were selected for this study, comprising 34 BI1 patients, 38 BI2 patients, and 34 control individuals. In the horizontal plane, the sphenoid crest-clivus distance in BI2 was significantly greater than BI1 and control group, with no significant difference between BI1 and control group. For all vertical measurements, such as basisphenoid length, BI2 values were significantly shorter compared to BI1 and control group, again with no significant difference between BI1 and control group. There were no significant differences among the groups in the sphenoid angle. Craniometric analysis focused on the sphenoid bone supports a clear distinction in BI2 patients, suggesting more extensive and pronounced cranial changes. In contrast, the changes in BI1 patients were not significantly different from those in normal subjects, indicating that these malformations are primarily associated with the underlying cranio-cervical segmentation defect.

Indexed as

PlatybasiaSkull BaseSphenoid BoneAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesCephalometryChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultBasilar invaginationCephalometricEmbryologyPathophysiologyPlatybasiaSphenoid

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.