Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41184646›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025

PotatoMASH is a cost-effective marker system for genomic prediction in potato based on short-read haplotypes.

Lea Vexler, Agnieszka Konkolewska, Stephen Byrne, Tom Ruttink, Maria de la O Leyva-Pérez, Jie Kang, Denis Griffin, Richard G F Visser, Herman J van Eck, Dan Milbourne

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lea VexlerTeagasc, Crop Science Department, Oak Park, Carlow, R93 XE12, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3095-1283
Agnieszka KonkolewskaTeagasc, Crop Science Department, Oak Park, Carlow, R93 XE12, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3030-9319
Stephen ByrneTeagasc, Crop Science Department, Oak Park, Carlow, R93 XE12, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1179-2272
Tom RuttinkFlanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Plant Sciences Unit, Caritasstraat 39, Melle 9090, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1012-9399
Maria de la O Leyva-PérezTeagasc, Crop Science Department, Oak Park, Carlow, R93 XE12, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5416-7584
Jie KangCharles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9619-5775
Denis GriffinTeagasc, Crop Science Department, Oak Park, Carlow, R93 XE12, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3906-2594
Richard G F VisserPlant Breeding, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 386, 6700 AJ, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0213-4016
Herman J van EckPlant Breeding, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 386, 6700 AJ, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6530-0616
Dan MilbourneTeagasc, Crop Science Department, Oak Park, Carlow, R93 XE12, Ireland. Dan.Milbourne@teagasc.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8323-6195

Funding

Horizon 2020 771134Teagasc Walsh scholarshipTop Sector Agri and Food TU18075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageAmplicon sequencing and read-backed haplotyping enable cost-effective genomic prediction in potato, with SNPs and haplotags showing similar performance across 23 traits, supporting scalable breeding applications and competitive prediction ability with GBS. Genomic prediction (GP) supports plant breeding by accelerating genetic improvement; however, the high cost associated with dense genotyping platforms restricts their use in routine breeding. This study evaluates the efficacy of PotatoMASH, a cost-effective, low-density, amplicon-sequencing platform generating SNPs and short-read multi-allelic haplotypes (haplotags), for GP in potato. First, we compared the prediction ability (PA) achieved using 2,236 SNPs and 2,000-3,390 haplotags from 339 amplicon loci of PotatoMASH with previously reported PA values obtained from a high-density 43.6 k SNP GBS dataset. PA was only moderately reduced, by 14% for SNPs and 9% for haplotags, indicating that the platform offers a scalable alternative to GBS. We then applied it to a diploid panel for GP of 23 agronomic, quality, and morphological traits. Both marker types yielded medium to high PA (0.29-0.81) across the traits. Haplotags outperformed SNPs in 11 traits, while SNPs performed better in six, with no difference in the remaining six traits. We conclude that PotatoMASH, which facilitates the concurrent detection of both SNPs and haplotypes at a reduced cost, provides a versatile and economical genotyping solution suitable for integrated pipelines that combine marker-assisted selection (MAS) and GP in potato breeding.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenomicsHaplotypesPlant BreedingSolanum tuberosumCost-Benefit AnalysisGenetic MarkersGenotypePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.