ArticlePain and therapy2026
Pulsed Radiofrequency Analgesia Alters EEG Spatiotemporal Dynamics: A Microstate-Based Exploratory Study.
Article in Pain and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a well-established neuromodulation technique widely used for managing neuropathic pain. Lumbosacral radicular pain, a common neuropathic condition, is often refractory to conventional treatments. Although dorsal root ganglion (DRG) PRF has emerged as a promising intervention, its therapeutic efficacy is often limited and variable, likely due to an incomplete understanding of its mechanisms. To elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying DRG PRF analgesia, this study characterized treatment-induced alterations in microstate spatiotemporal dynamics and examined their correlation with pain intensity, thereby assessing their potential as neurophysiological markers.
methodsWe recorded high-density electroencephalograms (EEG) in healthy controls and patients before and after DRG PRF treatment. Topographic differences were assessed using topographic analysis of variance (TANOVA). Microstate temporal parameters (duration, occurrence, coverage) and transition probabilities were analyzed. Pearson correlation analysis was performed between transition probabilities and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores.
resultsTANOVA revealed significant differences in microstate topographies among the three groups (p = 0.033), primarily attributed to microstates C and E. Although we found no significant differences in global temporal parameters or transition probabilities, our exploratory analysis revealed a reduction in the transition probability from microstate D to E (Delta TM D to E) in patients before DRG PRF treatment compared to healthy controls (p = 0.016, uncorrected). Notably, this reduction showed a trend toward normalization after treatment. Furthermore, we observed a significant negative correlation between Delta TM D to E and VAS scores (r = -0.459, p = 0.008).
conclusionDRG PRF alleviates neuropathic pain by normalizing interactions between large-scale brain networks, as evidenced by topographic reorganizations and trends toward normalized transition dynamics. The sensitivity of microstate metrics to these changes supports their potential as neurophysiological markers for assessing both pain-related brain dysfunction and treatment response.
trial registrationThe trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the following number: ChiCTR2500104921.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.