ArticleScientific reports2025
New robust estimator for handling outliers and multicollinearity in gamma regression model with application to breast cancer data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hybrid analysis of photovoltaic energy data containing excessive structural zeros.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gamma regression model (GRM) is commonly used to analyze continuous data that are positively skewed. However, the GRM is sensitive to multicollinearity and outliers. These two problems often occur in regression analysis. Multicollinearity can make the estimated coefficients unstable and cause inflated variance, while outliers can lead to misleading results and reduce the reliability of statistical conclusions. To overcome these issues, we propose a new robust gamma ridge regression estimator that combines a ridge regression estimator with robust estimation methods such as M-estimation and Mallows-type estimators. The ridge part of the model helps to reduce the effects of multicollinearity, while the robust estimation minimizes the impact of outliers, leading to more accurate and stable results. We support our method with detailed theoretical comparisons and a series of Monte Carlo simulations under different conditions. The results show that our proposed model consistently performs better than the traditional gamma ridge regression estimator, especially when multicollinearity and outliers are present. Furthermore, we apply our model to a breast cancer dataset that contains both issues. The application confirms that our method provides more reliable coefficient estimates and better predictions compared to the conventional methods. Based on these results, we recommend using this robust gamma ridge regression estimator, especially in biomedical studies and other fields where multicollinearity and outliers are common problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.