GuidelineEuropean radiology2026
ESR Essentials: Vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic fractures-practice recommendations by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe.
Guideline in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) pose a significant global health challenge, frequently leading to chronic pain, reduced mobility, and increased morbidity and mortality. Management options include conservative therapy, pharmacological treatment, and vertebral augmentation. In this latter field, vertebroplasty (VP) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) have proven to be successful in managing painful OVCFs, with faster pain relief and functional recovery, as well as reduced complications, morbidity, and mortality rates compared to non-surgical approaches. Optimal outcomes are obtained when vertebral augmentation is provided 3-6 weeks after the onset of the fracture. Among the different vertebral augmentation techniques, VP presents a cost-effective and widely accessible option, whereas BKP offers further advantages in restoring vertebral height and kyphotic deformity. Nevertheless, BKP is technically more challenging and more time- and resource-consuming compared to VP. For this reason, BKP is reserved for selected patients, such as those with a relatively long life expectancy. In addition to vertebral augmentation, long-lasting anti-osteoporotic medication is crucial for the long-term prevention of new OVCFs. This manuscript offers practical recommendations for the management of OVCFs and encourages the appropriate use of vertebral augmentation techniques. Key Points There is growing evidence that early intervention with vertebral augmentation may benefit patients with osteoporotic fractures, though consensus on timing and patient selection is still evolving. Early vertebral augmentation improves pain relief and patients' morbidity and mortality. Tailored approach: vertebroplasty for accessibility; balloon kyphoplasty for vertebral height restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41184540What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.