Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41184522›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Levels of heavy metals distribution near an urban wastewater in Southeastern Michigan.

Matt Chames, Eva N Nyutu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matt ChamesDepartment of Biology, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, 48221, USA.
Eva N NyutuDepartment of Biology, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, 48221, USA. nyutuen@udmercy.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Detroit River watershed has been utilized for industrial and recreational activities. Over the past century, the river has undergone significant urban, industrial, and agricultural development. The Detroit River has a long history of environmental quality monitoring. However, due to changes in sampling methods and assessment techniques over the years, it is challenging to determine whether the river's condition has improved. The absence of baseline data to assess the levels of dissolved heavy metals near the Detroit wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) is evident in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate the concentrations of dissolved heavy metals (Cr, Fe, Cu, Zn, As, Cd, and Pb) near the upstream and downstream areas of the Detroit WWTP, allowing for an assessment of heavy metal mobility. The study found that all the sites had higher concentrations of heavy metals in the upstream sites (1, 3, and 4) compared to the downstream sites (5 and 6). However, the mean concentrations of all detected heavy metals at both sites were below the limits set by the US EPA. This information is crucial for identifying at-risk watersheds and can serve as a benchmark for future contaminant reduction strategies and remediation efforts.

Identifiers

PMID41184522
PMCPMC12583573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.