Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41184515›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Music emotion classification based on random swap algorithm.

Abigail Wiafe, Sami Sieranoja, Pasi Fränti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abigail WiafeSchool of Computing, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, Joensuu, FI-80101, Finland. wiafe@cs.uef.fi.
Sami SieranojaSchool of Computing, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, Joensuu, FI-80101, Finland.
Pasi FräntiSchool of Computing, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, Joensuu, FI-80101, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed an unsupervised cluster analysis of emotions in music. We considered ten distinct perceived emotions (happy, sad, amusing, annoying, anxious, relaxing, dreamy, energizing, joyful, and neutral) from four genres (rock, pop, classical, and electronic). We first clustered emotions based on their co-occurrence across songs, revealing that the emotion pairs of amusing/annoying, energizing/anxious, and relaxing/sad exhibited a strong correlation. We then clustered the songs into eight groups using the random swap clustering algorithm based on their emotional profiles (the distribution of emotion ratings for each song). The results revealed six clusters with one dominant emotion (relaxing, annoying, happy, amusing, anxious, and dreamy), one cluster with no emotion (neutral), and one cluster with an equal distribution of all emotions. Notably, some song clusters included both positive and negative emotions, thereby highlighting the presence of mixed emotional responses to music. The results are informative for future studies on emotions and emotional responses to music. These findings deepen our understanding of emotions evoked by music and provide a foundation for advancing research in music emotion recognition (MER). The same approach can also be applied to other types of media, such as poetry, painting, film music, and social media conversations.

Indexed as

ClusteringEmotify+Emotion recognitionMusic

Identifiers

PMID41184515
PMCPMC12583566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.