Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41184487›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2025

Effects of urbanization on local adaptation and eco-evolutionary feedbacks in white clover.

Ella Martin, Marc T J Johnson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ella MartinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ella.martin@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8171-4691
Marc T J JohnsonDepartment of Biology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9719-0522

Funding

Canada Research Chairs (Chaires de recherche du Canada) CRC-2022-00111Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) RGPIN-2022-04913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urbanization is causing unprecedented ecological and evolutionary change worldwide. However, empirical evidence of local adaptation to urban environments is limited. Here we conduct a reciprocal transplant experiment using white clover (Trifolium repens) originating from urban and rural populations and distributed equally into five urban common gardens and five rural common gardens. Half of the plants in each garden produced the antiherbivore chemical defence hydrogen cyanide (HCN), and the other half lacked the defence, as this trait is known to exhibit genetic clines along urbanization gradients. Based on measurements of multiple vegetative and sexual fitness traits as well as ecological interactions with herbivores, pollinators and mutualistic root bacteria, we detect divergent selection on HCN between urban and rural environments, where HCN improved fitness in rural environments and reduced fitness in urban environments. Urban and rural white clover populations show genetic divergence that drove a tradeoff in life history strategies: urban plants invested more in vegetative growth, whereas rural plants produced more flowers and seeds in both urban and rural gardens. Finally, we demonstrate eco-evolutionary feedbacks, with increased herbivory at rural sites, and increased pollinator visitation to acyanogenic plants at urban sites. This study contributes to understanding how urbanization affects evolution and feeds back to influence broader ecosystem processes.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBiological EvolutionTrifoliumUrbanizationHydrogen CyanidePollinationHydrogen Cyanide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.