ReviewSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2025
Greek anatomical nomenclature: the urgent need for evidence-based standardization.
Review in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Greek has shaped anatomical terminology for over two millennia, providing much of the lexical foundation of the Terminologia Anatomica. Despite this profound legacy, modern Greek anatomical nomenclature remains only partially aligned with the latest Terminologia Anatomica 2, characterized by outdated expressions, multiple synonyms, and inconsistent adoption in medical education and clinical practice. In contrast, countries with coordinated, evidence-based national standards achieve greater clarity and enhance clinical safety. In Greece, the persistence of obsolete or ambiguous terms creates academic barriers and poses clinical risks, including misinterpretation of diagnostic findings and surgical errors. This review traces the historical contribution of Greek to international nomenclature, evaluates the current state of Greek anatomical terminology, and uses global examples to propose a plan for modernization. Key recommendations include forming a national multidisciplinary committee, systematically cross-mapping Greek terms to Terminologia Anatomica 2, standardizing terminology in education and licensing, and creating a multilingual open-access database. These efforts would preserve Greece's linguistic heritage while ensuring accuracy, clarity, and international compatibility in modern medical communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41184463What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.