ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2026
Percutaneous CT-Guided Cryoablation of T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study of Efficacy and Safety.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on: Percutaneous Cryoablation of Clinical T1b Renal Tumors: A Tertiary Cancer Center Experience.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Percutaneous Cryoablation of Clinical T1b Renal Tumors: A Tertiary Cancer Center Experience.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Observational
- Adjunctive Techniques for Optimizing Percutaneous CT-Guided Cryoablation of Renal Tumours.Cancers · 2026Review
- Cryoablation Outcomes in T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Role of Patient Selection and Standardised Endpoints.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Commentary on "CT-Guided Percutaneous Cryoablation of Small Renal Masses: General Anesthesia Versus Conscious Sedation with Dexmedetomidine".Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has risen in recent decades, mainly due to the widespread use of diagnostic imaging. Percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) is minimally invasive, making it favorable if surgery is contraindicated. This study evaluates the oncological efficacy and safety of PCA as a treatment for T1b RCC. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 35 patients with T1b RCC treated with PCA. Patients were included if they had at least 3 years of follow-up. Oncological outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Furthermore, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes were described, and postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
resultsThe primary efficacy rate was 68.6%, with a median follow-up time of 34.7 months (range: 0-66.5 months), and the secondary efficacy rate was 77.1%, with a mean follow-up time of 41.6 months (range: 0-66.5 months). After primary PCA, 17.1% (n = 6) were incomplete. Local tumor progression was found in 14.3% (n = 5) of patients. The disease-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 80.0%, 69.3%, and 60.0%, respectively. Four patients (11.4%) progressed from localized RCC to metastatic disease. The average decline in eGFR was 6.7 mL/min/1.73 m
conclusionThis study found that treating T1b RCC with PCA was challenging. Local tumor control rates were low, and the risk for metastatic progression was high. However, PCA demonstrated a commendable safety profile, with few complications and good preservation of kidney function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3, a retrospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.