ReviewCardiovascular and interventional radiology2025
Imipenem/Cilastatin in Embolization: From Antibiotic to Therapeutic Agent.
Review in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genicular Artery Embolization Using Imipenem/Cilastatin vs. Microsphere for Knee Osteoarthritis (GAUCHO). 12-Month Clinical Results of a Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Trial
- Multi-site efficacy and safety of transarterial microembolization with imipenem/cilastatin for refractory musculoskeletal pain: a single-centre analysis of hip, knee and shoulder (FIRE-NEM study).La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Genicular Artery Embolization (GAE) for the Treatment of Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis in Selected Nonoperative Patients: A Pilot Study at 6 Months Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Safety of extensive mesenteric embolization using quick-soluble gelatin sponge particles: an experimental canine study.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Repeated Genicular Artery Embolization Using Permanent Microspheres for Severe Osteoarthritis and Postsurgical Pain.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Observational
- Standardized angiographic workflow and technique for genicular artery embolization.CVIR endovascular · 2026Article
- Sheathless microcatheter: a new approach for musculoskeletal arterial embolization.CVIR endovascular · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionImipenem (IPM) is a broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic primarily used to treat bacterial infections. Beyond its antimicrobial properties, it has also been explored as a temporary embolic agent in interventional radiology. This application is due to its ability to form particulate suspensions, leading to transient occlusion of small blood vessels.
methodAs an embolic agent, imipenem cilastatin (IPM/CS) induces vessel occlusion and typically recanalizes within 90 min to 48 h in normal vasculature, though recanalization may take longer in inflamed or hyperemic tissues. As cilastatin may exhibit anti-inflammatory effects, potentially enhancing the therapeutic profile of the compound, this property makes it particularly useful for conditions associated with abnormal neovascularization and inflammation. IPM/CS has been commonly used for temporary embolization in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions, tumor-related bleeding, and inflammatory hyperemia, and offers a minimally invasive therapeutic approach with rapid resolution.
conclusionClinical studies have demonstrated its safety, with minimal complications compared to permanent embolic agents. Unlike permanent embolization materials, its transient nature reduces the risk of long-term ischemic damage while effectively managing pain and inflammation. Given its dual function as both an antibiotic and an embolic agent, IPM/CS represents a promising tool in interventional radiology, warranting further research to optimize its clinical applications. The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence on the clinical applications, mechanisms, and outcomes of IPM/CS as a temporary embolic agent, and to highlight future directions for its use in interventional radiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41184457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.