ArticleScientific reports2025
Clarifying the origin of the interpubic cavity using a biomechanical model and the finite element method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient-Specific Finite Element Analysis of Tibialis Anterior Tendon Insertion Variability and Its Impact on First Ray Biomechanics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The interpubic cavity is a narrow, slit-like, oval-shaped cavity which has frequently been described within the fibrocartilaginous interpubic disc. The aim of the study was to clarify the origin of the primary interpubic cavity. Knowledge of the physiological load of the pubic symphysis while standing and walking is important when deciding on the load after pelvic fractures and when developing implants to fix injuries in the pubic region, and therefore this knowledge could clarify the origin of the interpubic cavity. It is not possible to measure the load on the pubic symphysis in clinical practice, therefore the authors simulated the load on the pelvis during walking using the finite element analysis. Analyses were performed on a physiological pelvis model loaded with a force corresponding to the reaction force in the hip joint. The pubic symphysis was more heavily loaded with forces from muscle groups, the maximum deformation on the pubic symphysis was localised to two places that are permanently loaded during physiological walking. The area associated with the distribution of reduced stress, the middle and caudal parts of the interpubic disc, correlates very well with the frequency of occurrence of the interpubic cavity. It can therefore be assumed that the cavity helps the joint with load bearing during the transition to bipedal walking, i.e., at the time of high biomechanical load. This study will help us clarify the origin of the interpubic cavity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.