ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced stratification of male pattern hair loss using AI through novel loss region ratio analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging non-invasive tools for hair follicle assessment: a narrative review on hyperspectral and terahertz imaging.Lasers in medical science · 2026Review
- Revisiting Diffuse Unpatterned Alopecia: Reappraisal of a Controversial Diagnosis.Skin appendage disorders · 2026Review
- Comparative efficacy of oral dutasteride and low-, medium-, and high-dose oral minoxidil: a six-month prospective trichoscopic and clinical study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Rethinking pattern hair loss classification in the era of trichoscopy and artificial intelligence.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Male pattern hair loss (MPHL) is a common dermatological condition with significant psychological and clinical impacts. Traditional grading systems, such as the Norwood-Hamilton and Basic and Specific (BASP) classifications, rely on subjective assessments, limiting accuracy and reproducibility. This study introduces an AI-based grading framework that incorporates a novel area ratio metric to provide a more objective and standardized assessment of MPHL severity. A total of 761 images from 257 patients were analyzed to develop and evaluate an AI-based framework for grading MPHL. The framework utilizes the area ratio metric as a quantitative alternative to the traditional BASP length ratio. Model performance was assessed using precision and recall metrics, with bounding box and mask evaluations validating the accuracy and consistency of hair loss region identification. The AI model achieved an average precision of 97.6% in bounding box evaluations and 96.1% in mask assessments, demonstrating high accuracy in identifying hair loss regions. However, challenges in detecting smaller regions were reflected in slightly lower recall values for mask evaluations. Stratification accuracy was consistently high for Grades I, II, IV, and VI, with variability observed in intermediate grades due to boundary overlap. The novel area ratio metric outperformed the BASP length ratio, particularly in higher MPHL grades, offering a more reliable and objective framework for hair loss classification. This study shows that AI can improve MPHL diagnostics by using a data-driven and standardized grading system. The area ratio metric enhances precision and consistency, especially in advanced MPHL grades, offering better diagnostic accuracy and supporting personalized hair loss treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.