Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41184424›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning prediction of overall survival in patients with cT1b renal cell carcinoma after surgical resection using the SEER database.

Zufa Zhang, Li Chen, Zuyi Chen, Sheng Guan, Danni He, Hongxuan Song, Fengze Jiang, Weibing Sun, Feng Tian, Long Lv and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zufa ZhangAffiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, 116001, Liaoning, China.
Li ChenFuzhou Children's Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian, China.
Zuyi ChenAffiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, 116001, Liaoning, China.
Sheng GuanAffiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, 116001, Liaoning, China.
Danni HeAffiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, 116001, Liaoning, China.
Hongxuan SongAffiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, 116001, Liaoning, China.
Fengze JiangAffiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, 116001, Liaoning, China.
Weibing SunAffiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, 116001, Liaoning, China.
Feng TianAffiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, 116001, Liaoning, China.
Long LvAffiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, 116001, Liaoning, China. lvlong113@126.com.
Sixiong JiangAffiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, 116001, Liaoning, China. sixiongjiang_dyfe@163.com.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 62376050the Science and Technology Bureau of Dalian 2022RQ088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate survival prediction is essential for guiding follow-up strategies in patients with cT1b renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Traditional AJCC TNM staging systems provide limited prognostic accuracy. Data from the SEER database were used, which included 22,426 patients with cT1b RCC who underwent surgical resection. The data were randomized into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratioen, suring comparability using standardized mean differences (SMD < 0.1). A random survival forest (RSF) model was developed and compared with support vector machine (SVM) and extreme gradient boosting accelerated failure time (XGB-AFT) models. Model performance was assessed using AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and calibration, with 1000 bootstrap resamples. Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values were calculated to explore variable importance and enhance interpretability. The RSF model achieved the highest discrimination for predicting 5- and 10-year overall survival (AUC: 0.746 and 0.742), outperforming AJCC TNM (AUC: 0.663 and 0.627), SVM, and XGB-AFT. The model demonstrated good calibration and clinical net benefit. SHAP analysis identified age, tumor size, grade, and marital status as the top contributors to survival prediction. The RSF model significantly improves survival prediction over conventional staging systems and other machine learning methods, with enhanced interpretability through SHAP analysis. While the lack of external validation and the use of overall survival (including non-cancer deaths) are limitations, the model shows strong potential for clinical implementation and may facilitate individualized follow-up planning. Future studies should validate the model prospectively and explore integration into clinical decision support systems.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsMachine LearningAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSEER ProgramSupport Vector MachineAJCCcT1bRCCRSFSEERSVMTNMXGB-AFT

Identifiers

PMID41184424
PMCPMC12583456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.