ArticleScientific reports2025
Scraping enhances microbial DNA recovery over swabbing in sensitive facial skin: a pilot study of 10 patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Protocols and challenges in managing multi-source biological evidence at the crime scene: a scoping review.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensitive skin is a common condition with a complex pathogenesis involving both host-related factors and microbial interactions. Emerging evidence suggests a bidirectional relationship between skin microbiome dysbiosis and sensitive skin, although whether microbial shifts are causal or consequential remains unclear. Characterizing the microbiome in this population is particularly challenging due to low microbial biomass and heightened skin reactivity, both of which may compromise sampling and data quality. While swabbing remains the most common method for skin microbiome collection, it may fail to yield sufficient DNA, especially from delicate facial areas. In this pilot study of 10 patients with sensitive facial skin, we compared swabbing to gentle scraping using a sterile No. 10 surgical blade. Swabbing consistently failed to recover detectable microbial DNA. In contrast, scraping was well-tolerated and enabled one-time sampling that yielded sufficient DNA for both bacterial and fungal sequencing. DNA concentrations ranged from 0.065 to 13.2 ng/µL for bacteria and 0.104 to 30.0 ng/µL for fungi. Genus-level classification rates exceeded 99.7% for bacteria and 97% for fungi. Shannon diversity indices ranged from 0.03 to 2.85 for bacteria and 0.106 to 2.849 for fungi. PCoA revealed substantial inter-individual variation in community composition. Dominant taxa included Staphylococcus aureus group, Cutibacterium acnes group, Malassezia restricta, and Malassezia globosa. These findings indicate that skin scraping is a feasible and reproducible method for microbiome studies of sensitive skin, providing comprehensive taxonomic and ecological profiling in a single, non-invasive session.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.