Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41184403›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning analysis and simulation of pharmaceutical drying process based on prediction of concentration distribution and mass transfer.

Khaled Almansour, Hashem O Alsaab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Khaled AlmansourDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia. kh.almansour@uoh.edu.sa.
Hashem O AlsaabDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Taif University, Taif, 21944, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling and analysis of the lyophilization process for low-temperature drying of pharmaceutical compounds was evaluated via a hybrid model that combines mass transfer and machine learning. We investigated the predictive accuracy of three machine learning models- Ridge Regression (RR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Decision Tree (DT)-for estimating the concentration (C) in a three-dimensional space, characterized by coordinates X, Y, and Z. Hyper-parameter optimization was performed using the Dragonfly Algorithm (DA) to enhance model performance. Among the models evaluated, the SVR model exhibited superior predictive performance. Excellent generalization was shown by the SVR model's R² test score of 0.999234 and R² train score of 0.999187. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) was recorded at 1.2619E-03, and the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was 7.78946E-04, both reflecting high accuracies. The maximum error observed in predictions was 5.18029E-03, further underscoring the model's precision. These findings show that SVR, when improved with the Dragonfly Algorithm, is a very accurate and dependable way to guess the amount of chemicals in a certain area. This makes SVR a useful tool for chemical engineering and related fields.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsComputer SimulationFreeze DryingPharmaceutical PreparationsSupport Vector MachinePharmaceutical PreparationsCFDDrug dryingMass transferPharmaceuticalsPurification

Identifiers

PMID41184403
PMCPMC12583511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.