ArticleScientific reports2025
Safety of ribavirin in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) - a preliminary study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Viral infections remain a major health concern in psittacine birds, with avian bornaviruses (ABV) causing proventricular dilatation disease (PDD), a chronic and often fatal condition. Ribavirin, a broad-spectrum antiviral drug widely used in human medicine, has shown in vitro (ABV) and in ovo (Newcastle disease virus) efficacy against some avian viruses, but its safety profile in birds is largely unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of prolonged ribavirin administration in healthy cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) aged approximately 6 months. The experiment consisted of experimental group (10 cockatiels) and negative control group (10 cockatiels). Ribavirin was administered to the experimental cockatiels according to the following protocol: orally (by gavage at dose 30 mg/kg body weight [BW]/day) two consecutive 28-day courses (course 1 & 2) separated and followed by 14-day recovery periods, then 15 mg/kg BW/day orally and 15 mg/kg BW/day intranasally for 28 days (course 3). The cockatiels were regularly weighed, clinically examined, and blood was collected for hematological and biochemical analyses. No clinical signs of adverse reactions were observed, neither during the therapy nor for 12 weeks after the therapy. BW changed significantly during the experiment, however without any link to ribavirin treatment. Only hematocrit decreased significantly after the ribavirin course 1. Our results indicate that ribavirin at 30 mg/kg BW, administered orally or in combination with intranasal dosing does not appear to cause apparent clinical or laboratory adverse reactions in cockatiels, except for potential alteration of hematocrit which is, however, too mild to be clinically meaningful. This provides an essential first step toward evaluating ribavirin as a therapeutic option for avian viral diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.