ArticleScientific reports2025
Genomic analysis of Listeria monocytogenes diversity over a 10-year period in Uruguay.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Listeriosis: a re-emerging threat to public health-a comprehensive review of its epidemiology, pathogenesis, and control measures.Infection · 2026Review
- A Case ofInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Functional cooperation between LIPI-4 and listeriolysin O governs intracellular replication and systemic virulence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Listeria monocytogenes is a globally relevant foodborne pathogen and a major public health concern because of its ability to cause severe invasive disease and persist in food processing environments. This study aimed to characterize the genomic diversity of L. monocytogenes isolates collected in Uruguay from food and clinical cases of listeriosis between 2010 and 2019. The genomes sequences of 142 isolates representatives from a national collection were obtained and used for comparative genomic and phylogenetic analysis along with other 55 genomes from different geographical regions. The isolates belonged to lineages I (88%) and II (12%) and were distributed across 20 clonal complexes. The clonal complexes CC3, CC2, and CC1 were predominant. Notably, CC3 accounted for nearly one-third of the isolates and was evenly distributed between food and clinical sources, contrasting with its relatively low frequency in most international datasets. A novel sequence type (ST2832) and 112 new core genome MLST profiles were identified. The circulation of the rare clonal complex CC517 was detected, with evidence of persistence in food environments and a potential link to a human case. Comparative analysis revealed considerable virulence gene diversity, including specific distribution of LIPI-3 and LIPI-4 among lineages and clonal complexes, and the presence of truncated allelic variants of the inlA gene in food-derived lineage II isolates. Phylogenetic analysis showed strong concordance with MLST-based classification and reveals linkage among isolates form different sources suggesting epidemiological relation between food and human cases of listeriosis. This study provides the first comprehensive genomic overview of L. monocytogenes in Uruguay, revealing the predominance of lineage I isolates from food and clinical sources, a particular high prevalence of CC3 and the local circulation of the rare CC517. The results highlight the importance of whole genome and phylogenetic analysis as molecular epidemiology tools and show the contribution of including isolates from underrepresented regions in global genomic databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.