ArticleScientific reports2025
Wave energy and other environmental drivers as predictors of seeded-coral performance on the great barrier reef.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wave energy shapes coral reef communities, yet its influence on early coral survival and growth remains poorly understood, limiting its use in reef restoration planning. This study investigated the survival and growth of three Acropora species deployed on seeding devices across a wave energy gradient at three reefs on the Great Barrier Reef. After 1.5-2 years, survival varied significantly within reefs, among sites, and among species, with highest average yield at Moore Reef (A. millepora, 32% after 554 days) followed by Davies Reef (A. hyacinthus, 24% after 527 days) and Heron Reef (A. hyacinthus: 13% and A. cf. kenti: 23% after 834 days). However, no single environmental variable, including nominal wave energy, bottom stress, flow velocity, sedimentation or benthic community composition consistently predicted survival, and effects weakened over time. Coral size and survival varied more at the device level than across sites, indicating the importance of fine-scale spatial and transient factors. These findings underscore the limitations of broad-scale environmental models to guide restoration and highlight the need for flexible, site-specific strategies. While seeding devices show promise as a scalable restoration tool, their success depends on matching species to suitable microhabitats and monitoring local conditions over time to support long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.