Trial reportScientific reports2025
Efficacy of external physical vibration lithecbole combined with tamsulosin in upper ureteric stones after ESWL: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Medical Expulsive Therapy after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Yonsei medical journal · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining external physical vibration lithecbole (EPVL) with tamsulosin to enhance the clearance of upper ureteric stones (10-20 mm) after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). In a prospective, randomized clinical trial, patients with upper ureteric stones were allocated to a control group receiving ESWL followed by daily tamsulosin (0.4 mg) or a treatment group receiving both ESWL and EPVL in addition to tamsulosin. The primary endpoint, the stone-free rate (SFR), was assessed at 1, 2, and 4 weeks post-ESWL. Secondary endpoints included complication rates, with radiologic evaluations conducted at predetermined intervals to monitor stone clearance. In this randomized trial involving 211 participants, 106 received the intervention, while 105 served as controls. EPVL significantly enhanced stone fragment clearance. At week one, the SFR between the groups was similar (51.9% vs. 45.4%, P = 0.912). However, at weeks two and four, the treatment group demonstrated significantly higher SFR of 81.1% and 90.6%, respectively, compared to 64.8% and 75.2% in the control group (P = 0.020 and P = 0.011). No significant differences were observed in complication rates (P > 0.05). The treatment group underwent an average of 6.2 EPVL sessions, with a mean stone expulsion time of 20.3 ± 4.7 days. The combination of EPVL and tamsulosin following ESWL significantly increased the SFR while maintaining a favorable safety profile, suggesting that this integrated approach could offer a more effective treatment pathway for stone expulsion. Further studies in larger, multi-center cohorts are needed for validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.