Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41184342›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Simulation-based inference for subject-specific tuning of middle ear finite-element models towards personalized objective diagnosis.

Hamid Motallebzadeh, Michael Deistler, Florian M Schönleitner, Jakob H Macke, Sunil Puria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hamid MotallebzadehDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, California State University, Sacramento, CA, USA. h.motallebzadeh@csus.edu.
Michael DeistlerMachine Learning in Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Florian M SchönleitnerTUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Garching, Germany.
Jakob H MackeMachine Learning in Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Sunil PuriaEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, USA.

Funding

Why do mammals have a flexible three-bone ossicular chain?R01DC005960 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STEELE, CHARLES RICHARD · 2004 to 2018
$5.4M
Objective and noninvasive diagnosis of middle-ear and conductive pathologies using simulation-based inference and transfer learning applied to clinical dataR21DC020274 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI MOTALLEBZADEH, HAMID · 2022 to 2024
$549k
CIHR PJT-189955NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005960NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC020274NIH/NIDCD R21DC020274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational models, particularly finite-element (FE) models, are essential for interpreting experimental data and predicting system behavior, especially when direct measurements are limited. Tuning these models is particularly challenging when a large number of parameters are involved. Traditional methods, such as sensitivity analyses, are time-consuming and often provide only a single set of parameter values, focusing on reproducing averaged trends rather than capturing experimental variability. New approaches are needed to make computational models more adaptable to patient-specific clinical applications. We applied simulation-based inference (SBI) using neural posterior estimation (NPE) to tune an FE model of the human middle ear against subject-specific data. The training dataset consisted of 10,000 FE simulations of stapes velocity, ear-canal input impedance, and absorbance, paired with seven FE parameter values sampled within plausible ranges. By using simulated data, we generated a diverse training dataset, enabling efficient learning by the neural network (NN). The NN learned the association between parameters and simulation outcomes, providing a probability distribution of parameter values, which could be used to produce subject-specific computational inferences. By accounting for noise and test-retest variability, the method provided a probability distribution of parameters, rather than a single set, fitting three experimental datasets simultaneously. Importantly, examining the inferred parameter distributions alongside prior knowledge of normal ranges enables individualized differential inference used for diagnosis. SBI offers an objective alternative to sensitivity analyses, uncovering parameter interactions, supporting personalized diagnosis and treatment, and compensating for limited clinical training data. This method is applicable to any computational model, enhancing its potential for improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationEar, MiddleFinite Element AnalysisPrecision MedicineHumansNeural Networks, ComputerFinite-element methodPatient-specific modelsSimulation-based inferenceTuning mechanistic models

Identifiers

PMID41184342
PMCPMC12583476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.