ArticleScientific reports2025
Simulation-based inference for subject-specific tuning of middle ear finite-element models towards personalized objective diagnosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Composite Certainty: Addressing Metric Degeneracy in Parameter Inference for Model-Based Diagnostics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Composite Biofidelity: Addressing Metric Degeneracy in Biomechanical Model Validation and Machine Learning Loss Design.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational models, particularly finite-element (FE) models, are essential for interpreting experimental data and predicting system behavior, especially when direct measurements are limited. Tuning these models is particularly challenging when a large number of parameters are involved. Traditional methods, such as sensitivity analyses, are time-consuming and often provide only a single set of parameter values, focusing on reproducing averaged trends rather than capturing experimental variability. New approaches are needed to make computational models more adaptable to patient-specific clinical applications. We applied simulation-based inference (SBI) using neural posterior estimation (NPE) to tune an FE model of the human middle ear against subject-specific data. The training dataset consisted of 10,000 FE simulations of stapes velocity, ear-canal input impedance, and absorbance, paired with seven FE parameter values sampled within plausible ranges. By using simulated data, we generated a diverse training dataset, enabling efficient learning by the neural network (NN). The NN learned the association between parameters and simulation outcomes, providing a probability distribution of parameter values, which could be used to produce subject-specific computational inferences. By accounting for noise and test-retest variability, the method provided a probability distribution of parameters, rather than a single set, fitting three experimental datasets simultaneously. Importantly, examining the inferred parameter distributions alongside prior knowledge of normal ranges enables individualized differential inference used for diagnosis. SBI offers an objective alternative to sensitivity analyses, uncovering parameter interactions, supporting personalized diagnosis and treatment, and compensating for limited clinical training data. This method is applicable to any computational model, enhancing its potential for improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.