ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimising the workflow of coronary computed tomography angiography through effective timing and heart rate management.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the variations in image quality of CCTA conducted at different time intervals and their clinical implications. A retrospective analysis of 641 patients who underwent CCTA between July 2023 and June 2024 was performed. The examination times were divided into morning group(8:00-12:00, 316 cases), and afternoon group༈14:00-18:00, 325 cases) for comparison. For patients with a heart rate ≥ 60 bpm, 25 mg of metoprolol was given orally to control heart rate, along with 0.5 mg of sublingual nitroglycerin before the CCTA examination. Image quality, initial heart rate, post-medication heart rate, heart rate differences (pre- and post-medication), percentage heart rate changes, radiation dose, age, and sex were compared between the two groups. Statistical analyses, including the Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman correlation coefficients, and logistic multivariate regression, were used to assess factors influencing image quality. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyse the predictive value of examination timing on image quality. The image quality excellence rates for the morning group and the afternoon group were 87.9% and 74.1%, respectively, with no undiagnosable cases in either group. Significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed between the two groups in subjective image scores, post-medication heart rates, heart rate differences (pre- and post-medication), percentage heart rate changes, and age. However, no significant differences were found in initial heart rate, radiation dose, or sex (P > 0.05). Logistic multivariate regression analysis indicated a statistically significant association between image quality and both examination timing and age (P < 0.05). However, no significant associations were found with initial heart rate, heart rate differences (pre- and post-medication), percentage heart rate changes, radiation dose, or sex (P > 0.05). The regression equation was determined as Y = 11.386 + 0.873 × 1 + 0.023 × 2, where Y represents image quality, X1 represents the examination timing, and X2 represents age. For the morning group, the ROC curve area under the curve (AUC) for initial heart rate and post-medication heart rate were 0.598 and 0.890, with optimal thresholds of 79 bpm and 71 bpm, respectively. For the afternoon group, the AUC values were 0.596 and 0.812, with optimal thresholds of 75 bpm and 68 bpm, respectively. CCTA performed in the morning (8:00-12:00) yields superior image quality compared to the afternoon (14:00-18:00). Moreover, morning CCTA scans tolerated higher initial heart rates (up to 79 bpm) without affecting image quality, in contrast to the lower threshold of 75 bpm in the afternoon. These findings offer robust data to guide the timing of clinical CCTA procedures and heart rate management, indicating that morning CCTA scans may facilitate higher-quality imaging, especially for patients with elevated heart rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.