Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41184309›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Injectable bioresorbable conductive hydrogels for multimodal brain tumor electroimmunotherapy.

Amit Singh Yadav, Umut Aydemir, Karin Hellman, Peter Ekström, Abdelrazek H Mousa, Jiaxin Li, Muhammad Anwar Shameem, Cedric Dicko, Johan Bengzon, Fredrik Ek and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Amit Singh YadavDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Chemical Biology & Therapeutics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5118-4538
Umut AydemirDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Chemical Biology & Therapeutics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0128-7889
Karin HellmanDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Chemical Biology & Therapeutics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5957-7160
Peter EkströmDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Chemical Biology & Therapeutics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9010-4388
Abdelrazek H MousaDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4050-9253
Jiaxin LiNeurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Muhammad Anwar ShameemDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6173-3417
Cedric DickoPure and Applied Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6377-3500
Johan BengzonNeurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Fredrik EkDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Chemical Biology & Therapeutics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5651-8445
Martin HjortDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Chemical Biology & Therapeutics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3581-4720
Roger OlssonDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Chemical Biology & Therapeutics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. roger.olsson@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7107-3472

Funding

Cancerfonden (Swedish Cancer Society) 24 3629 PjVetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2023-04965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current electrode technologies are too rigid for safe and effective delivery of electrotherapy in the brain, and patients with glioblastoma continue to face a devastating prognosis, with median survival stalled at 15 months despite intensive treatment with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. But these conventional approaches potentially compromise immune function, underscoring the urgent need for therapies that activate, rather than suppress, the immune system. Therefore, we introduce injectable conductive hydrogels engineered to match the softness of brain tissue while exhibiting electrical conductivities up to three orders of magnitude higher than any previously reported injectable hydrogels. They can be implanted through minimally invasive syringe capillaries as narrow as 30 µm-avoiding brain tissue damage-and via convection-enhanced delivery (CED) or endovascular catheters, the latter potentially eliminating the need for open brain surgery. Additionally, it can drape a resection cavity to eliminate residual tumor cells. In human glioblastoma tumors in the chicken chorioallantoic membrane model, implantation of the electrode using CED, followed by irreversible electroporation, obliterated tumors within three days. Other injection techniques impaired tumor growth, induced immunogenic cell death, and a robust infiltration of helper and cytotoxic T cells, alongside macrophages, highlighting the immune-activating and tumor-targeting capabilities.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsElectrochemotherapyGlioblastomaHydrogelsImmunotherapyAnimalsCell Line, TumorChick EmbryoChickensCombined Modality TherapyElectric ConductivityElectroporationHumansInjectionsMiceHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID41184309
PMCPMC12583519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.