Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41184303›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Predictive factors for the success of the Paul glaucoma implant: a one-year multicenter prospective study.

Elena Millá, Javier Moreno-Montañés, Susana Duch, Aitor Lanzagorta, Jesús Téllez, José Vicente Piá, Elena Arrondo, Jorge Vila, Alfonso Antón, Javier Bóveda and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Two-year efficacy and safety outcomes of the Paul Glaucoma Implant compared to the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elena MilláHospital Clinic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier Moreno-MontañésClínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. javmormon@gmail.com.
Susana DuchVerte-ICO, Innova Ocular, Barcelona, Spain.
Aitor LanzagortaFundació Oftalmologia Mèdica de la Comunitat Valenciana, Valencia, Spain.
Jesús TéllezHospital de S. Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
José Vicente PiáFundació Oftalmologia Mèdica de la Comunitat Valenciana, Valencia, Spain.
Elena ArrondoInstituto Microcirurgia Ocular (IMO) Grupo Miranza, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jorge VilaHospital Universitario La Fe, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Alfonso AntónInstitut Catalá de la Retina, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier BóvedaComplejo Hospitalario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain.
Jordi LoscosHospital Universitario Hermanos Trias y Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain.
Spain’ Paul Glaucoma Implant Group (SPGG)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Paul Glaucoma Implant (PGI) is becoming increasingly used in many countries. The primary aim of this study was to identify the most important pre-, intra- and post-operative factors associated with successful intraocular pressure (IOP) control at one year. A total of two hundred and fifty -one eyes from 239 glaucoma patients undergoing PGI surgery were included in this prospective, multicentre, longitudinal study. Clinical data were collected on a REDCap platform using a standardised surgical protocol. Variables were recorded pre-, intra- and postoperatively. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify predictors of complete success at one year. These results are expressed as Odds Ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was also performed. Mean IOP was significantly reduced from 25.3 ± 8.8 mmHg preoperatively to 13.1 ± 3.9 mmHg at one year (p < 0.001). The medication burden decreased from 3.03 ± 1.12 to 0.78 ± 0.96 (p < 0.001). Most complications were minor and self-limiting. Factors associated with complete success in univariable or multivariable analysis were: use of intraoperative antimetabolites (mitomycin or 5-fluorouracil) [OR 2.59; 95% CI 1.18-5.67], combined phacoemulsification-PGI surgery [OR 4.38; 95% CI 1.10-17.36] and removal of the ripcord after 4-5 months [OR 2.36; 95% CI 1.07-5.18]. High myopia was only associated in the univariable analysis (OR 0.50; CI 0.30-0.85; p = 0.010). Previous glaucoma surgery, hypertensive phase, surgeon experience and diagnosis of non-open angle glaucoma were not significantly associated with complete success. This study concluded that the effectiveness of the PGI can be enhanced by implementing certain strategies that have not shown similar benefits in Ahmed or Baerveldt glaucoma devices.

Indexed as

GlaucomaGlaucoma Drainage ImplantsAgedFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeGlaucoma drainage deviceIntraocular pressurePaul glaucoma implantPrognostic factors

Identifiers

PMID41184303
PMCPMC12583770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.