ArticleNature communications2025
Complex de novo structural variants are an underestimated cause of rare disorders.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting retinal and macular degeneration in the genomics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Rare disease genomics in an era of human pangenomics and telomere-to-telomere genome references.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- Near-perfect genome sequencing in medical genetics.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Do common dopaminergic variants modulate processing speed in cognitive aging? A longitudinal candidate gene study.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Complex de novo structural variants (dnSVs) are crucial genetic factors in rare disorders, yet their prevalence and characteristics in rare disorders remain poorly understood. Here, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of whole-genome sequencing data of 12,568 families, including 13,698 offspring with rare diseases, obtained as part of the UK 100,000 Genomes Project. We identify 1,870 dnSVs, constituting the largest dnSV dataset reported to date. Complex dnSVs (n = 158; 8.4%) emerge as the third most common type of SV, following simple deletions and duplications. We classify 65% of these complex dnSVs into 11 subtypes. Among probands with dnSVs (n = 1,696), 9% exhibit exon-disrupting pathogenic dnSVs associated with the probands' phenotype. Notably, 12% of exon-disrupting pathogenic dnSVs and 22% of de novo deletions or duplications previously identified by array-based or whole-exome sequencing methods are found to be complex dnSVs. We also find distinct genomic properties of de novo deletions depending on the parent of origin. This study highlights the importance of complex dnSVs in the cause of rare disorders and demonstrates the necessity of specific genomic analysis to avoid overlooking these variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.