ArticleNature communications2025
Development and validation of a clinical wearable deep learning based continuous inhospital deterioration prediction model.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- From perception to response: translational progress implementation challenges of wearable non-invasive continuous vital sign monitoring in early warning for inpatients.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- AI-based augmentation of oncology clinical trials.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Wearable devices and cardiovascular health: revolutionizing remote monitoring and disease prevention.European heart journal · 2026Review
- Nurses as guardians of time: the hidden clinical value of continuous care in geriatrics.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- State of clinical AI in 2026.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Standard episodic patient monitoring of vital signs on the medical-surgical wards can potentially miss changes in health status and delay recognition of risk. To reduce these delays, we develop a clinical wearable-based deep learning model, using 9 inputs, comprised of continuous vital signs and demographics, to identify the onset of deterioration early and accurately. Using validated data from 888 adult non-intensive care unit inpatient visits with 135 outcomes, from two different clinical grade wearables, we train a recurrent neural network to predict clinical alerts and adverse clinical outcomes in the subsequent 24 hours. Our continuous clinical alert model is able to predict both clinical alerts (Area under both the Receiver Operator Characteristic curve 0.89 + /- 0.3, Precision Recall curve 0.58 + /- 0.14) and adverse clinical outcomes (accuracy: 81.8% on 11 events) up to 17 hours in advance. Our wearable based continuous clinical alert system outperforms episodic clinical support tools in detecting deterioration, retains its performance when tested on data from a different clinical wearable than the one it was trained on and can produce alerts ahead of a broad class of adverse clinical outcomes, enabling timely interventions that can avert preventable deteriorations and reduce hospital costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.