ArticleBlood cancer journal2025
Synthetic control arm from mixed clinical trials and real-world data from the LYSA group for untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients aged over 80 years: a bona fide strategy for innovative clinical trials.
Article in Blood cancer journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence as a Disruptive Force in Pharmaceutical Innovation: Transforming Discovery, Development, and Manufacturing.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Opportunities and risks associated with external comparator cohorts in clinical drug development in hematology.Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients over 80 years (≥80 y.o.) with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) are underrepresented in clinical trials (CT). Use of synthetic control arms (SCA) could help to build innovative comparative trials. With this analysis, we aim to demonstrate the clinical performance & use of such SCA. With data from both CT (LNH09-7B) and real-world (REALYSA), we built a mixed SCA composed of ≥80 y.o. patients with DLBCL in the first line of treatment. In order to display clinically meaningful results, we demonstrate how we can reproduce SENIOR results, a double-arm randomized CT, by switching the internal control arm with our newly built SCA. Patients between arms were balanced using a stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting approach (sIPTW) based on propensity scores (PS), and the endpoint was overall survival (OS). All covariates included in PS were well balanced after weighting, and OS of Mixed SCA vs. SENIOR experimental arm were not statistically different, with a HR of 0.743 [0.494-1.118] (p = 0.1654). Use of SCA built only from real-world data (REALYSA) and sensitivity analyses using different missing data management methods didn't differ from the whole analysis. In newly diagnosed elderly DLBCL patients, the use of SCAs can mimic the control arm of an RCT and could be used to build comparative CT for elderly patients and come up with fast-innovative CTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.